PECULIARITIES OF AUDIT SAMPLING

PDF (Українська)

Keywords

audit
audit sampling
statistical sampling
stratification
simple random sampling
monetary unit sampling

How to Cite

TkachО. L. (2020). PECULIARITIES OF AUDIT SAMPLING. Entrepreneurship and Trade, (26), 98-102. https://doi.org/10.36477/2522-1256-2020-26-14

Abstract

Despite the relative elaboration of the sampling issue, the problem of its usage in the case of audit of enterprises, that use public resources remains unsolved, despite the importance of such an audit at the national level. The main task of this study is to determine the main prerequisites and peculiarities of the sampling method in audit. The paper attempts to generalize the main prerequisites and features of the use of the sampling method in auditing. Emphasis was placed on the audit of enterprises that use public resources. It is determined that terminological problems in the field of selective research method are primarily due to the fact that in some cases the terms are borrowed from probability theory and mathematical statistics, and in some – are autonomous and formed exclusively in the field of audit. The dual nature of the concept "audit sample" is established. On the one hand it is a way to obtain audit evidence (sample method of research), and on the other the sample from which this evidence is formed. This vision expands the position of international standards, where the audit sample is defined as "the application of audit procedures" or the method of obtaining audit evidence. Sampling method is based exclusively on the professional judgment of the auditor. For sampling under ISA 530, statistical and non-statistical methods can be used in the audit. After analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the non-statistical method of research, in the case of auditing enterprises, that use public resources, it is recommended to use only statistical sampling methods. If the auditor intends to use non-statistical sample observation, it is better to replace it with audit of the whole population. It is proved that this approach avoids the risk of anomaly. The flowchart of the audit sample in the audit of enterprises, that use state resources is constructed. The flowchart can be used by auditors to determine the applicability of the audit sample and method of sampling. Despite the possibility of using a sampling which corresponds to the principle of "sufficient confidence", the question about the methodology of its conduct is still open. Further research will be carried out in this direction.

https://doi.org/10.36477/2522-1256-2020-26-14
PDF (Українська)

References

Бондар В. П. Нормативна регламентація вибіркового способу в аудиті. Проблеми теорії та методології бухгалтерського обліку, контролю і аналізу. 2007. № 9. Вип. 3. С. 5–17. URL: http://pbo.ztu.edu.ua/article/viewFile/72375/67870.pdf (дата звернення: 20.07.2020).

Гутцайт Е. М. Аудит: концепция, проблемы, стандарты. Москва : Современная экономика и право, 2000. 80 с.

Івахненков С. В. Проблеми застосування вибіркового методу в аудиті фінансової звітності. Бухгалтерський облік і аудит. 2010. № 3. С. 40–44.

Методичні рекомендації з проведення Рахунковою палатою фінансового аудиту: рішенням Рахункової палати від 22.09.2015 № 5-5 / Рахункова палата. URL: https://rp.gov.ua/upload-files/About/RegulatoryDoc/arp_6.pdf (дата звернення: 12.07.2020).

Про Рахункову палату: Закон України від 06.12.2016 № 1774-VII / Верховна Рада України. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/576-19#Text (дата звернення: 26.07.2020).

Шапочка М. К., Маценко О. М. Теорія статистики: навчальний посібник. Суми : Університетська книга, 2014. 312 с.

Шеремет А. Д., Суйц В. П. Аудит : Учебник. 5-е изд., перераб. и доп. Москва : ИНФРА-М, 2005. 448 с.

Arens, A A., Loebbecke, J. K., Lemon, W. M., Splettstoesser, I. B. Auditing and other assurance services (9th Canadian ed.). 2003. Toronto, ON: Pearson Education Canada Inc.

Mautz, R. K., Hussein A. Sharaf The philosophy of auditing, Sarasota, Fla.: American Accounting Association. 1974. 212 p.

Taylor, D. H., Glezen, G. W. Auditing, Integrated Concepts and Procedures. New York: Wiley Corp., 1991. 900 р.

Gavenda, M. Statistical Versus Non-Statistical Sampling in Sales & Use Tax Audits. The Journal of State Taxation. 2001, Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 65–73.

Sipahi, B. Muhasebe Denetiminde Örneklem Büyüklüğü Üzerinde Etkili Unsurlar ve Örneklem Büyüklüğünün Tespiti. Muhasebe ve Denetime Bakış. 2003. № 8, pp. 99–110.

Temelli F., Çınar Ö. Statistical Sampling Methods in Accounting Audit. Selected Studies on Economics and Finance / Edited by Başar S., Çelik A.A. and Bayramoglu T. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, UK, 2018, pp. 282–294.

Bondar, V. P. (2007), “Normative regulation of the selective method in the audit”, Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu i analizu, Vol. 9, Issue 3, p. 5–17, available at: http://pbo.ztu.edu.ua/article/viewFile/ 72375/67870.pdf (accessed: 20 June 2020).

Gutzeit E.M. (2000), Audit: concept, problems, standards, Modern Economics and Law, Moscow.

Ivakhnenkov, S. V. (2010), Problems of sampling application in financial statements auditing, Bukhhalterskyi oblik i audyt, Vol. 3, pp. 40–44.

The Accounting Chamber (2015), “Methodical recommendations for conducting the financial audit by the Accounting Chamber”, available at: https://rp.gov.ua/upload-files/About/RegulatoryDoc/arp_6.pdf (accessed: 12 July 2020).

The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2016), The Law of Ukraine “On the Accounting Chamber”, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/576-19#Text (accessed: 26 July 2020).

Shapochka, M. K., and Matsenko, O. M. (2014), Theory of statistics: a textbook. University Book, Sumy.

Sheremet, A. D. and Suitz, V. P. (2005), Audit, 5th ed., INFRA-M, Moscow, Russia.

Arens, A A., Loebbecke, J. K., Lemon, W. M., & Splettstoesser, I. B. (2003), Auditing and other assurance services, 9th Canadian ed., Pearson Education Canada Inc., Toronto, Canada.

Mautz, R. K. and Hussein A. Sharaf (1974), The philosophy of auditing, American Accounting Association, Sarasota, Fla., USA.

Taylor, D. H. and Glezen, G. W. (1991), Auditing, Integrated Concepts and Procedures. Wiley Corp., New York, USA.

Gavenda, M. (2001), “Statistical Versus Non-Statistical Sampling in Sales & Use Tax Audits”, The Journal of State Taxation, Vol. 20, Issue 1, pp. 65–73.

Sipahi, B. (2003), “Muhasebe Denetiminde Örneklem Büyüklüğü Üzerinde Etkili Unsurlar ve Örneklem Büyüklüğünün Tespiti”, Overview on Accounting and Auditing, vol. 8, pp. 99–110.

Temelli, F. and Çınar, Ö. (2018), “Statistical Sampling Methods in Accounting Audit”. Selected Studies on Economics and Finance / Edited by Başar S., Çelik A.A. and Bayramoglu T. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, London, UK.