EXPERIENCE OF FORMING INNOVATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES OF SOME FOREIGN COUNTRIES
Abstract
Abstract. Considering the case of the formation of a knowledge society, it should be noted that the huge role in this process belongs to the development of information technologies. Today, such technologies are used in virtually all branches of economy and the facilities of the hotel and restaurant industry are not an exception. Technological development, investment in infrastructure and innovation activity are carried out at a faster pace in most developed countries. For introduction modern technologies into production, foreign capital and highly skilled personnel from the world labor market are attracted. Finance and personnel are needed in order to increase the competitiveness of high technologies and science, to properly organize research in appropriate areas. The main attention is paid to the formation of innovation infrastructure in conditions of project selection, which would have innovative developments (technology or products), project monetization potential and export orientation of production. The global competitiveness index weakly correlates with the prospects for future growth of production, but very clearly demonstrates the factors that have been key to the development of innovative production. Such factors are: education, technology, the level of informatization, openness of production and its integration into international trade blocs. Considering the experience of foreign countries in creating elements of innovative production aimed at developing the scientific and technical potential of universities, large corporations and small businesses, we see: there is a continuous need for updating and improvement of legislation, the serious support of regional production clusters, which creates an infrastructure for the development of new and high-tech products and services, as well as their successful commercialization.
References
2. Касьяненко В. О. Зарубіжний досвід управління інноваційним потенціалом економіки та можливості його використання в Україні / В. О. Касьяненко // Маркетинг і менеджмент інновацій. – 2011. – № 4, т. ІІ. – С. 200-204.
3. Коноваленко Н. В. Інвестиційний податковий кредит як інструмент фінансування діяльності промислових підприємств / Н. В. Коноваленко // Науковий вісник Національного університету ДПС України. – Сер.: Економіка, право. – 2011. – Вип. 3(54). – С. 106-111.
4. Кучко Е. Е. Социальные инновации: подходы к определению и классификации / Е. Е. Кучко // Вісник Харківського національного університету ім. В.Н. Каразіна. – Сер.: Соціологічні дослідження сучасного суспільства: методологія, теорія, методи. – 2011. – № 941. – С. 27-33.
5. Никифоров А. Є. Податкове стимулювання інноваційної діяльності / А. Є. Никифоров, В. М. Диба, В. О. Парнюк // Фінанси України. – 2009. – № 5. – С. 78-86.
6. Троян В. Інновації в Німеччині / В. Троян // Наука та інновації : наук.-практ. журнал НАН України. – 2005. – № 1. – С. 125-129.
7. Beijing E-town Economic Development Area: http://www.bdainvest.com.
8. Chesbrough H.W. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. – Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
9. China News. - Mode of access: http://www.-china.polpred.com.
10. Europe and the Global Information Society, 1994. (eds. Bangemann, M.) -Mode of access: http://-europa.eu.int/ISPO/infosoc/backg/bangeman.html
11. Finland as a knowledge economy: elements of success and lessons learned/ edited by Carl J.Dahlman, Jorma Routti, Pekka Yla-Anttila. 2007.
12. Government Strategy Document 2003. - Mode of access: http://valtioneuvosto.fi/tiedostot/pdf/en-/42828.pdf.
13. https://www.google.com.ua.
14. Huuhtanen H. 2001. Tietoyhteiskuntaa rakentamassa. Helsinki: TIEKE Tietoyhteiskunnan-kehittämiskeskus ry (Publisher).
15. INNO-policy NrendChart – Policy trends and Appraisal Report: China 2007. - Mode of access: http://www.proinno-europe.eu.
16. Jaaskelainen J. 2005. Renewal of Finnish Industry Policies in he 1990s: Porter or Jonkinen, J. 1999. “The Public-Private Partnership to Meet the Demand for IT Skills: Program for Increasing Education in the Fields of Information Industry in Finland.” Paper presented at OECD Workshop on Science and Technology Labor Markets, May 17, 1999.
17. Lundvall B.-A. 1999. Nation States, Social Capital and Economic Development: A System’s Approach to Knowledge and Learning.
18. Manninen A. 2003. Näin tehtiin Suomesta tietoyhteiskunta. Helsinki: Talentum.
19. Motohashi Kazuyuki, Ziao Yun. China’s innovation system reform and growing industry and science linkages // Research Policy. Oct 2007. Vol 36. Issue 8.
20. Rouvinen P., and P. Yla-Anttila. 1999. “Finnish Clusters and New Industrial Policymaking”. In OECD Proceedings, Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach.
21. Sitra. – Mode of access: http://www.sitra.fi-/en/about-sitra.
22. Walton Richard E. Work innovations in the United States // Harvard Business Review. Jul/Aug 1979. Vol. 57. Issue 4. – P. 88-98.
23. Yla-Anttila P. and T. Lemola. 2003. Transformation of Innovation System in a Small Country: The Case of Finland.
_.png)
